Thanks for the update. I'll be installing mono along with evolution in an attempt to get MD running per Levi's instructions at:
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/monodevelop-list/2006-September/004442.html
My understanding from your post is that MD is not fully operational after doing this. Is this correct?
-Leon S
Posted by Leon at November 24, 2006 06:29 AMUhm, since MD is loosely based on SharpDevelop, why not work closer with the SD development crew to make it integrate better with Mono instead of getting MD to run half-way on Windows and SD to work half-way with Mono? Wouldn't both IDE's benefit from a shared codebase in this area?
Posted by Asbj�rn Ulsberg at November 24, 2006 08:54 AMHi Paco,
First of all, Happy Thanksgiving! Very nice present you brought for all of us.
I just installed last night so haven't tested all that comes bundled, except of course MD :D
Hope this kind of packages helps to promote Mono to Windows developers.
Regards,
Mart�n Trejo
Posted by ChilliCoder at November 24, 2006 10:15 AMPaco, this is wonderful work. Have you opened a bug for the MD issue in Windows? I would like to track it and have a look if I figure out what could be happenning.
As for the SD suggestion, I totally agree Asbjorn, but perhaps this should be discussed in the SD forums and/or MD lists. BTW, this could be very difficult to achieve because now the codebases differ very much, and it's difficult to integrate things from a WinForms app to a GTK# one, and viceversa; besides it would be difficult to convince the SD guys to use GTK# (which in my opinion is much better), and it would be difficult to mantain MonoDevelop as the "Gnome" IDE and at the same time fully Windows-compatible.
This is the disadvantage of free software. There are so many alternatives that there is few cooperation :(
Posted by knocte at November 24, 2006 12:36 PMThank you very much for your effort. Now it seems to be possible build a cross-platform app using MonoDevelop add-in engine.
Posted by Michal Harakal at December 4, 2006 06:48 AM